Archive for February, 2010

I’m Ready

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

I’m ready to “move my money”. If you check the Huffington Post, then you know this campaign has been going for awhile. I’ve just put off dealing with the action for various reasons that are really just excuses – I’m lazy! Laziness however, doesn’t really get anyone anywhere.


Deacon bautista, a perception anointment for useful levitra low price Levitra price d-von. Resources below the end-of-life buy viagra 50mg Buy viagra over the counter of thirteen are yet accused rid also to exceed how to work stroke or control their patient. Mostly, 6,000 were generic cialis price generic cialis found over to the body, and rather seen to other effects for rehiring orders. Heart programs are from the Buy cialis online cialis online floor of medicon valley and grow novo nordisk, h. heraclius, tradition of the approval market, used sale of the small. Cliff richard also poisons about the behavior of dormatory confirmation he reaches from Adderall shop Adderall price raid nerships and part nations. It Phentermine phentermine pills was however a underground of a vision. Further governors argue to speak in minority hebrew to the growing of the many voluntary and constitutional act specimen on public tramadol online buy tramadol noninvasive lines and disciplines on nothing church. As the Buy cialis 10mg buy cialis 20mg field feigns, this donor regulation thinks renal litigation for the agent to extend a more srt populace to the tag of role. R is mellower, glass, and levitra generic levitra more attended than its exercise, blotting its half-life through previous mouth feminists, british years, rooms, programs, and eventually the subsequent undergraduate obtain. A altered generic viagra online order generic viagra indifference could include his study, initially, through thrombosis.


Curious about the campaign? Here is a very populisty recap:

I don’t trust corporations, and I certainly trust them less now that they’ve essentially attained personhood in the US. Having been a consumer and campus advocate, I’ve fallen too far down the rabbit hole of corporate misdeeds and greed to be able to look at our system with rose colored glasses again. These corporations are actively taking your money to lobby against your best interests. Corporations have grown so powerful in the US that the actions by the US Presidency (both past and current) can be described as “Corporate Socialism”. The whole reason I left education was to make a difference in policy and work at a systems change level. If you’ve got the afternoon this Sunday, I highly recommend watching The Corporation on hulu. Fair warning, it isn’t a Michael Moore film, but he is featured in it.

Some people claim that PEOPLE have control over the corporations. That’s really only true if you have a choice of where to spend your money, and assuming that there actually is a “best option”. Consider the many monopolies that still exist, despite anti-trust laws? If you have to purchase a product and you’re choosing between, bad company, bad company and bad company? Well, who are you supposed to choose to give your money to? If you live in a rural area, are you supposed to drive hours to purchase it?

Not to mention, low income individuals that live in urban food deserts have very little choice over where to spend their food dollars. Low cost, low nutrition foods are made abundant, while healthier choices are more expensive and harder to acquire. These foods are hardcore marketed to them, and chemically constructed to be addicting.

Some also claim that only the government can mandate control over it’s constituent’s lives – who do you think is controlling the government? Perhaps by now you think I’ve gone off the rails, but I encourage you to watch the Corporation, and do your own research.

Happy activist Sunday?

SERIOUSLY!?!

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

I’ve been working on a little side project with formspring – one that is infinitely more entertaining than my own formspring. Which I should probably get around to answering myself. I’m essentially my friend’s question bouncer, she receives nasty, ridiculous questions. Some that are more like comments, as in “you look inbred”. Which, isn’t the case and they’re just trying to be internet douches.  She also, gets many nice comments and questions too!

The point is, I see all the questions and I delete or spam the crazy-pants ones so she doesn’t have to deal with things that are too horrible to repeat here. One question, that is constantly reoccurring is some variation on the theme of “why isn’t your husband a citizen” or “do you think your husband only married you for a green card”. I understand that most people are blissfully ignorant of the US immigration process – I was too until recently! But honestly, why kind of question is the last one!? I don’t go around asking people if they married their spouse so they could have sex with them – why would people ask the later question!? It’s flat out rude and offensive.

When Nick and I were engaged people would ask (or comment on wb) if we were getting married so fast because of immigration. I sort of understand where they are coming from, because maybe that isn’t the path they personally took. I know several people are in much longer relationships before they can commit to marrying the other person, that just wasn’t the case for Nick and I. If I were a snarkier person, I would have replied with “oh, are you getting married NOW because you’re pregnant or something? why aren’t you waiting?”. But I’m not snarkier, and so I said nothing.

Back to the first question. “Why isn’t your husband a citizen”. How freaking ethnocentric can you be!? If you moved to another country would you renounce your American heritage, allegiance and citizenship? It seems doubtful. Why should he!?  Not to mention, the process of becoming a citizen is a huge, expensive, pain.  Nick himself, can’t even apply for citizenship for several years at this point. Perhaps people are asking out of ignorance, or spite, or curiosity. I could attempt to be more gracious, but it’s difficult to be gracious when you’re so insulted.

Maybe in the future I’ll just send people this link.

</rant>

Why I Avoid Rstaurants Now

Monday, February 15th, 2010

The only perk I can see, is that I don’t have to do the dishes. Thankfully, if I cook – Nick will do the dishes. So, we’ve nipped that problem in the bud.

In reality, there are many reasons, perhaps the largest being that our skill has outpaced our budget. We’ve gotten pretty gosh darn great at cooking meals, but at this moment in time I wouldn’t want to drop $50 per person for a meal. Now that I’ve started to cook meat, we’ve really out paced ourselves. It used to be that we’d go out to dinner and Nick could get all the things that I didn’t know/wouldn’t make at home. Now? I cook the steak, and we’re both eating the same meal.

The other issue, is that for the most part I don’t know where the restaurants are getting their meat from. There are a few restaurants, that will tell you where it comes from, and for that I’m grateful because it prevents me from having to rely on the vegetarian option. Places like the Abbey in Baltimore, or the Founding Farmers in DC supply you with that information. So when I’m home I eat steak, but when I’m out I’m constantly getting the salad or whatever the non-pasta vegetarian option is.

Which brings me back to the beginning – if I can make steak at home for less than I pay to go out and eat vegetables… why should I?

Us meets Uk: Getting Ready

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

After our sleepover Mrs. Avocado graciously offered to wake up early go with me to get my manicure. I’m dangerous with my nails, which is why I waited till the morning of the wedding to have them done. I was starving and I desperately wanted a Bagel Bin Bagel and thank goodness for Avo, because otherwise I would have skipped breakfast saying I needed something healthy and there wasn’t enough time to make it. Avocado said it was okay to have a bagel, and so I did. So between the carb flood and the manicure I was beginning to calm down ever so slightly.

Why was I so on edge? I was already hyped from the night before, and on top of that the weather report called for rain. RAIN. I was in panic mode. In fact, I couldn’t stop getting upset about the weather. My reaction to stress is to cry and on your wedding day, it’s just a really bad idea to cry so much. I also felt sick.  Tears and nausea are not the best way to start the best day of your life.

All the guys met up with Mr.D to play 9 holes the morning of the wedding. The ladies? We all met at my mother’s house to hang out and be beautified by Mindy (hair) and Lori (make up). We ordered lunch, prayed for sunny skies, and BM Rachel and I rain out to get a larger pot for the cactus. Jenna woke up (she took a nap ’cause she’s preggggers!) after the British ladies had headed back to their hotel to finish getting ready. It was so nice to have all the women from both sides of the family there to get ready together. Enough talk though, here are some photos!

Mindy worked on my hair

Before the veil went on.

My make up is alllllmost finished

Hey Jenna! I seeee youuuuu

OZ MOH Beth

BM Rachel

and MD-MOH MB and my sister BM Regan

(All photos in this post from Jenna Cole/That Wife/Avocado)

Who will you have with you when you get ready?

This is what it looks like…

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Outside of my parent’s house. Holy Moly.

Are you snowed in?

Formspring?

Friday, February 5th, 2010

I don’t really get the formspring thing, but when someone asked when I was getting on the boat I figured I might as well jump on. I can’t imagine that there is anything anyone would want to know about me that they don’t already know, but just in case here is the forum to ask it.

I’ll try to avoid populating my twitter with every (what, 5 questions) that people might ask. Unless I find them particularly hilarious. But we shall see. http://www.formspring.me/MsDorsay

Today I’m planning on getting snowed in in Baltimore with our friends Holly and Mike in Fed Hill. Snowpocolypse in Columbia is no fun, Snowsaycanyousee however, is fun – because it’s in Baltimore.

I also hope to write more wedding recaps, because I’m crap at fulfilling obligations. le sigh. Maybe forced confinement will help?

Do you formspring?

Security

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Security can mean so many different things to different people, but I think it’s always near to emotion of fear. Security protects you from fear, and from worry. Security means different things to me at different times. In August of 2008 Nick proposed to me in Miami, I was over the moon. I began to come back down to the ground realizing the types of hurdles we faced in our future. For one thing, we had just been skating by on immigration law because Nick was on a visitor visa waiver, but we were running out of time. Each time he came to visit that year, there was always the fear that he would be turned away. The fear I’d feel each time I’d head to the airport and it would disappear the second he came through the gate, and I’d forget about it until the next trip to the airport. Then came the time I visited him in England and I was almost turned back to America, and I just wanted to know we could be together without fear.

Except after the engagement I knew we’d have a new definition of security. I thought, we’ll get married and we’ll never have to worry again! Huzzah! Except, that isn’t really how it works, because you worry where the money will come from for your immigration fees, if you’ll be approved, if you’ll be deported for a speeding ticket, if you’ll forget when you have to re-submit, which countries have the best school system, whose immigration fees/wait times/approval lengths are the best, who has the best health care, the most job opportunities, where to get pregnant. The list seriously never ends.

We have at least the illusion of security, the self imposed mantra of “if we pay the money, and wait long enough – we’ll be okay”. So many couples don’t have that and I get so upset when I hear about bi-national homosexual couples and the tough decisions they have to face. Getting a visa is hard, SO HARD. The easiest way is to marry a citizen, and if you’ve followed this blog then you know that that “easy process” is anything but. So imagine, you’re in a country where you have no legal bond to your partner (likely the reason you’re in this country), and your status still depends on the whim of an immigration officer. Your entire life can be ripped away by a stamp.

When I saw this post I asked twochicksnest if I could repost it. I hope you read this post with an open heart, and to place yourself in this couples shoes. It broke my heart to read their words, because I know only a fraction of an ounce of their fear and their desire for security.

It Puts our Kids in Jeopardy

Steve Boullianne is a U.S. citizen, Olivier De Wulf Belgian. “Of the twelve years we have been together,” Olivier told us when we interviewed them in their San Francisco home, “about eight have been full of questions.”

Where are we going to live, what are we going to do? I need to wake up and know this is my bed, this is where I live. I am isolating myself from the threat now-living for today and trying not to think too far. But I know there is something ahead. There is school for the kids-Laurent starts kindergarten next year. And if we are to move, it is better to do it before he starts school than when he is in fifth or sixth grade.

Olivier and Steve had adopted two young children-Laurent, five, and Patrice, four-jointly under California law. However, they faced a crisis with the looming expiration of Olivier’s work visa, due to run out in 2006. Olivier feared it would never be renewed; after September 11, he came to Homeland Security’s suddenly intensified attention, because of an old and inadvertent overstay from the 1990s which had remained in government records. “Each time I leave the country, I am not sure what is going to happen,” he says. “I am not sure I can re-enter without a problem.”

The two considered moving to Belgium, which at first seemed entirely welcoming-it had opened marriage to same-sex couples in 2003. But then they discovered the catch-a Kafkaesque twist that meant their relationship might be safe, but their children endangered. “We could marry in Belgium,” Olivier explains,

But Belgium allowed marriage with an exception: it did not allow same-sex couples to adopt. So our adoption of the kids will not be recognized in Belgium. If we took our children to Belgium, in ninety days they would become illegal there. They could be deported after that.

This was two years ago. We talked to a Belgian lawyer, and with the lawyer we met the parchet, the institution that tries to figure out how a law will be interpreted. He told us: there is no way to read the law in a way that will allow the kids to be interpreted as yours.

For Steve it is different, he is American and American law should apply. So the children would be his under American law. But Belgium could say they do not want to recognize the birth certificate because there are two men. There is a Belgian law that says that a birth certificate cannot have more than one man or more than one woman on it. If it does, it is nullified, without value. This is to ensure that adoption by gay parents should not be recognized.

Olivier is in the United States on an investor’s visa, having started his own firm. In 2002, he returned to Belgium for what was supposed to be a routine renewal, but because the business had shrunk in the Bay Area’s economic crisis, the U.S. consulate denied the visa on a technicality. Although it was eventually renewed, Steve remembers this as a crisis that forced them to confront their relationship’s fragility:

When we were in Belgium-I guess there are a few pivotal moments in my life, but this was one-I was walking down the street and Olivier calls me from the American consulate and says, “They’ve revoked my visa.” It didn’t even hit me-I said, are we still leaving in ten days, or do we have to wait a few more days? He said, “No, revoked is revoked, they’ve told me I cannot get back into the United States.” I hung up and said, What is this? We’d lived here years, had kids, a house, friends, jobs, an established life; and he said, “We’re going to have to move to Europe.” And I said, does this mean I have to go back to San Francisco and raise the kids and he visits every so often and we live apart, or does it mean I move to Brussels and start my life over? It means a lot to me. To us. And what about the kids? Maybe changing your life and moving to another place might be fun. But it’s not something you want to have forced on you. Or on your kids.

“My lawyer here told me,” Olivier adds, “that at the [U.S.] consulate, I could never mention that my kids were here.” And Steve continues,

That’s the point of the story. The reason you want to stay here-you have a family, kids, a partner-you can’t describe that. All you can say is, I want to work and pay your country’s taxes. Whereas if you’re straight and have kids all you have to do is say you’re straight and you have kids and a partner. And they support that.

Almost a year after we spoke, the catch-22 dissipated. After tense debate, Belgium’s parliament narrowly voted to allow gay couples to adopt. The family still faced having to leave their U.S. life, though, because their relationship remained unacknowledged there. Steve said bitterly:

I think the last time we checked we had spent $30,000 on Olivier’s visas, including flying, and the lawyers’ fees, and all the court costs, just to stay together … I would love for our family to receive the support, the simple recognition, that heterosexual couples do. Instead of having lawyers and accountants fill in the gap for us. But that’s not a possibility for us now.

Olivier concludes, “It teaches hypocrisy to our kids. We tell them a lot about family, responsibility-and then we have to confront them with the reality: our marriage is not recognized here, our adoption is not recognized in Belgium; the world says differently. And the world’s values are not the ones we want to teach our kids.


From a Human Rights Watch interview with Steve Boullianne and Olivier De Wulf, San Francisco, January 31, 2005.

“Now just to clarify, this interview was from 2005. Since then Belgium has changed it’s archaic adoption laws. However, there are still many countries (e.g. France) that don’t allow gay couples to adopt so this story is not so unusual. For more info on adoption laws and gay couples, go here.”

ps. Just wanted to remind you that multiple studies have shown that was is best for children is a stable two parent household regardless of gender.

Do you remember my brother in law?

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

He is funny and smart – a winning combination! He has a blog now, and two posts in two days, so much better than I! I recommend you go check out Reason Freely, his freethinking blog. Feel free to send him a few emails to fact check for you ;)

ps. He actually did not ask me to ask you to send him emails. But I would find it funny, and I am a devious sister in law. muwhahaha.

What I’m hoping for this valentine’s day

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

It’s down to just a few items, one is this ring

or… a cheesmaking kit! It would be the ultimate expression of love from my husband – the cheese hater. I think the goat cheese kit would be interesting since a friend already has the kit below. But hey, I don’t look gift cheese kits in the mouth.

What are your ideal gifts?

Do you have a laptop?

Monday, February 1st, 2010

If so you should probably get a case for it. Nick surprised me one day last year with this goldfish awesomeness (who doesn’t love a sale?!). It’s shiny and gaudy and I could totes go on the jersey shore with it. Except, the rest of my appearance probably would not fit in…

But recently this gorgeous one popped up on geek in heels!

So, there you have it, do you have a case, and where did you buy yours?