I Love my Brother in Law
I love my brother in law for many reasons, including the fact that he makes my sister insanely happy. But, I really love my brother in law because when he gets an email like the one below. He fact checks it! The red parts are the original email, and the black parts are Jon’s additions.
How many zeros in a billion?
This is too true to be funny.
Too wrong to be true too…
The next time you hear a politician use the Word ‘billion’ in a casual manner, think about whether you want the ‘politicians’ spending YOUR tax money. A billion is a difficult number to comprehend. But one advertising agency did a good job of putting that figure into some perspective in one of it’s releases.
A. A billion seconds ago it was 1959.
A billion seconds ago was 1978, not 1959. I have lived almost a billion seconds. That’s a pretty big error – unless the email was originally written in 1990…
B. A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.
Close, but no. In 107AD, Trajan was emperor of Rome and Christians were still just one messianic mystery cult among several in Judea.
C. A billion hours ago our ancestors were Living in the Stone Age.
Well, that’s true, but it’s a pretty big target to hit.
D. A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet.
Well, if you’re a creationist, sure. No humans. But there were Hominidae, like orangutans and gorillas. This isn’t ancient-dinosaurs-ancient, but still pretty long ago.
E. A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, At the rate our government Is spending it.
Mostly in Iraq and Afghanistan, so we either have to leave those places or spend the money. The Republicans have been pushing for more and more troops and war spending.
While this thought is still fresh in our brain… let’s take a look at New Orleans .. It’s amazing what you can learn with some simple division.
Louisiana Senator, Mary Landrieu (D) Is presently asking Congress for 250 BILLION DOLLARS To rebuild New Orleans . Interesting number… What does it mean?
This was in 2005, right after Katrina, and it got killed in committee. It was pretty massive pork, really; but there really was that much damage to the city. And New Orleans is a major oil port, one of the few deep water ports on the gulf coast. So it is a valuable city to the US — not just for the people, but for the industry we all depend on. The levees in New Orleans were built on 19th century technology before Katrina, and basically didn’t exist after. The city needs a ton of money — maybe not $250B, but quite a lot
A.
Well .. If you are one of the 484,674 residents of New Orleans
(every man, woman, and child)
You each get $516,528..
This is simple division. How did they get 250,000,000,000 / 484,674 wrong, given that they could have used a calculator? $515,810.63. But close enough, I suppose, for the author’s point. Still, how do you get that wrong?
B. Or… If you have one of the 188,251 homes in New Orleans , your home gets $1,329,787.
C. Or… If you are a family of four… Your family gets $2,066,012. Washington, D.C.
HELLO! Are all your calculators broken??
Building Permit Tax CDL License Tax Cigarette Tax Corporate Income Tax Dog License Tax Federal Income Tax (Fed) Federal Unemployment Tax (FU TA) Fishing License Tax Food License Tax Fuel Permit Tax Gasoline Tax Hunting License Tax Inheritance Tax Inventory Tax IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax) IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) Liquor Tax Luxury Tax Marriage License Tax Medicare Tax Property Tax Real Estate Tax Service charge taxes Social Security Tax Road Usage Tax (Truckers) Sales Taxes Recreational Vehicle Tax School Tax State Income Tax State Unemployment Tax (SUTA) Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax Telephone State and Local Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax Utility Tax Vehicle License Registration T ax Vehicle Sales Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Well Permit Tax Workers Compensation Tax
(And to think, we left British Rule to avoid so many taxes) STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago…
Incorrect. Or a lie, depending on whether the author is uneducated or uninformed:
* To pay for the REVOLUTIONARY WAR Congress, once there was a Congress, levied taxes on several items on that list up there: Tobacco, spirits, sugar, carriages (the first DMV!), and lots of paperwork taxes among others. George Washington had to deal with the first post-revolution version of grumbly email forwards when some redneck farmers violently opposed the whiskey tax.
* 1861, Revenue Act. Funded the Civil War. 3% tax on incomes over $800. 1862 added taxes on items like “playing cards, gunpowder, feathers, telegrams, iron, leather, pianos, yachts, billiard tables, drugs, patent medicines, and whiskey” (per the IRS website) and created a tiered tax system with a standard deduction, not unlike what we have now.
* 1899, War Revenue Act. Funded the Spanish-American War. Funny how we raised all these taxes to pay for wars… This one raised taxes on paperwork, trade, even chewing gum. This is because the Revenue Act of 1861 and 1862 was challenged and defeated. Wingnuts will tell you it’s because the founders wrote protections against taxes in the constitution, but that’s a crock.
* 1913 (a mere 96 years ago — not 100, just yet), 16th Amendment, allowing for a mass Federal Income Tax (the Civil War taxes were only unconstitutional based on a technicality, not any founder’s intent). Interesting note: From 1913 through the Second World War, American taxes were very low for lower- and middle-income Americans and very high for high-income Americans. In 1918, for example, taxes started at 6% for the poorest, after a standard deduction, and topped out at 77% of income for the high income earners. During WWII, total income taxes took in 20% of US GDP!
And our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt… We had the largest middle class in the world… And Mom stayed home to raise the kids. What happened? Can you spell ‘politicians!’
Don’t blame taxes – they’re a lot lower today than they were in 1949 and 1918!
And I still have to Press ’1′ For English.
Ah, I see…
I hope this goes around the U S A At least 100 times What the heck happened?????
The Gini index, measuring income inequality in the US, has been rising since the “golden age” (not really, but that’s another email) where we had a large middle class after WWII. 1967, it was 39.7, which is about what the Gini index in Europe is right now (The EU Gini index is 39.0, I believe). In 2007 it peaked at 47.0 in the US (Bush’s legacy?), and has gone down only to something like 46.0 since. Higher numbers are more inequality (e.g. CEOs and Lawyers and Military Contractors make lots of money where Nurses and Teachers and Police make little money). Here’s an international comparison, with more fair countries in green and blue, more unequal countries in purple and red: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gini_Coefficient_World_CIA_Report_2009.png
Some poor countries are uniformly poor, like Mali; some are horribly unequal, like Sierra Leone. That makes sense. But some rich countries are more equal: Canada, Norway, Spain, UK… pretty much all of them. Two are very unequal: The US and China.
Have you ever fact checked an email you received? I usually visit factcheck.org, but they often don’t cover emails like this.


December 7th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Hahaha. I take too many things at face value and Mr. Peng takes nothing at face value, so this reminds me of him!
December 8th, 2009 at 7:43 am
I’m the annoying person who uses snopes.com on every foward possible and then does reply to all to the entire list to let them all know they are idiots if they believed it. It makes the person who sent it to me look really dumb and I’ve noticed that I don’t get many forwards anymore.
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:06 pm
[...] He is funny and smart – a winning combination! He has a blog now, and two posts in two days, so much better than I! I recommend you go check out Reason Freely, his freethinking blog. Feel free to send him a few emails to fact check for you [...]
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:42 pm
Ah, this is why you invited people to send me emails to fact check!
I’d rather they fact check me. I’d rather be corrected by a reader than wrong in perpetuity. But this little exercise was fun. I think it was a slow day at work. Speak of which, I have data to analyze for a grant and really shouldn’t be reading blogs!
September 17th, 2010 at 10:22 am
HAHAHAHA I love it! I love Jon, this is awesome!