<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fontalicious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.usmeetsuk.com/2009/05/fontalicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.usmeetsuk.com/2009/05/fontalicious/</link>
	<description>The life and times of a cross atlantic couple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:25:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://www.usmeetsuk.com/2009/05/fontalicious/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usmeetsuk.com/?p=1227#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Aesthetic wise I like Chopin, but I don&#039;t think it would make me want to vomit if I had to trace it. I think Savoey would be easiest to trace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesthetic wise I like Chopin, but I don&#8217;t think it would make me want to vomit if I had to trace it. I think Savoey would be easiest to trace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.usmeetsuk.com/2009/05/fontalicious/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usmeetsuk.com/?p=1227#comment-355</guid>
		<description>My favorite by far is English. I also like Savoey but it doesn&#039;t seem formal enough. English is pretty, unique, yet simple. And definitely manageable to trace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite by far is English. I also like Savoey but it doesn&#8217;t seem formal enough. English is pretty, unique, yet simple. And definitely manageable to trace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.usmeetsuk.com/2009/05/fontalicious/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.usmeetsuk.com/?p=1227#comment-354</guid>
		<description>This is a tough decision!  Before I weigh in on any one in particular, could a script that you like but isn&#039;t wholly usable (like the Roundhand) be tweaked slightly (assuming it has only a few unusable quirks, like just &#039;Q&#039;s, perhaps) to useable?

I think Edwardian and Chopin both rank high in the &quot;stress inducing&quot; category.  The others all seem more manageable, but each with a distinct personality!

Helpful, right? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tough decision!  Before I weigh in on any one in particular, could a script that you like but isn&#8217;t wholly usable (like the Roundhand) be tweaked slightly (assuming it has only a few unusable quirks, like just &#8216;Q&#8217;s, perhaps) to useable?</p>
<p>I think Edwardian and Chopin both rank high in the &#8220;stress inducing&#8221; category.  The others all seem more manageable, but each with a distinct personality!</p>
<p>Helpful, right? <img src='http://www.usmeetsuk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

